|
Sage
Grouse Coalition To Activists:
‘Put
Your Money Where Your Mouth Is’
Following
the federal government’s final decision not to list
the Greater Sage-grouse as an endangered species, the
Partnership for the West grassroots alliance issued a
challenge to the activist groups seeking the listing.
“We challenge those activist groups that pushed this
petition to put their money where their mouth is and
start funding actual conservation efforts instead of
funding lawyers and lawsuits,” said Diane Hoppe, Chair
of the Partnership and a Colorado State Representative.
“Federal agencies, State agencies, counties,
municipalities, conservation groups and many private
sector stakeholders are together spending tens of
millions of dollars to help conserve sage-grouse and its
habitat. What are some of these so-called environmental
groups bringing to the conservation table? Little beyond
a never-ending stream of destructive and costly
lawsuits.
“These
lawsuits end up hurting wildlife because they drown
wildlife biologists and conservation officials in
paperwork, drain dollars away from actual conservation
efforts, and scare folks away from the conservation
table,” Hoppe added. “It’s time these activists
chose conservation rather than conflict.”
Hoppe
praised the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and the
U.S. Interior Department for its decision not the list
the grouse. “This decision is a victory of science
over politics,” she said. “The field biologists did
their work and came to a science-based conclusion that
the bird was not on the verge of extinction. Now it’s
up to all of us to work together in the West to ensure
that this bird does not get into serious trouble in the
future.”
“...those
who pushed this listing petition forced the wasteful
spending
of
millions of taxpayers’ dollars... that could otherwise
have been spent
helping
sage-grouse and preserving their habitat.”
Jim
Sims
Hoppe also
praised several Members of Congress, especially U.S.
House Natural Resources Committee Chair Richard Pombo
(R-CA) and Representatives Jim Gibbons (R-NV) and Jim
Matheson (D-UT), for helping to lead the effort to
convince the federal government that state and local
stakeholders were in the best position to lead
sage-grouse conservation efforts.
Hoppe
added: “This is an especially big win for Western
landowners and farmers and ranchers. The overwhelming
majority of landowners are more than willing to pitch in
and help conserve this species on their land, but they
rightfully fear standing in front of the loaded and
cocked double-barreled shotgun that is the flawed
Endangered Species Act. It’s time to update and
modernize this law so that local folks who live on the
land are given incentives to protect species, rather
than encouraged to ‘shoot, shovel and shut up’ when
a species wanders across their land,” Hoppe said.
Jim
Sims, Executive Vice President of the Partnership, said:
“It is my hope that those who are truly interested in
seeing this species survive and flourish will come to
the table and help hammer out common sense conservation
efforts. The sad news is that those who pushed this
listing petition forced the wasteful spending of
millions of taxpayers’ dollars at the federal and
state levels that could otherwise have been spent
helping sage-grouse and preserving their habitat.
“The
good news is that there are many public interest groups
who truly care about the future of this species and who
are already engaged in constructive efforts to enhance
conservation efforts at the local level. We applaud
their efforts and we look forward to working with
them.”
(We have
long noted that environists do very little on the ground
to actually make improvements. They complain and they
file voluminous appeals and they sue, but they don’t
usually pick up trash, or rehab trails, or plant aspen
for habitat. Thanks to the Partnership for making a
public challenge to them. -Ed.) |